Display Tab does not appear in my AMD Software Adrenalin Edition Version 22.8.2. Unable to turn on Freesync without Display Tab.
Summary of issue: Hey everyone, sorry if the answer to this is really simple. I am very new in building computers and built my first one a few months ago with my brother-in-law (spec below). I have confirmed Freesync is turned on using my monitors manaul. However, when using my AMD Software, AMD's webiste says to turn on Freesync using the Display tab. My display tab is missing, and I do not see any mention of Freesync in either the system settings with AMD Adrenalin or the graphics settings. I wasn't even sure if there still is supposed to be a display tab on this version of the software. Is "Radeon Super Resolution" with AMD FSR technology the same thing as Freesync but with just a different name? Or is Radeon Enhanced Sync in the picture actually turning Freesync on? I have unistalled (factory reset) my graphics card drivers, uninstalled the AMD Adrenalin, and done everything short of reinstalling windows from suggestions online to try to get back a setting which is missing on AMD Adrenalin. What am I missing here? How do I get the display tab back to turn on Freesync with my graphics card? Thanks for any help and suggestions for this noob.
System Configuration:
- Operating System: Windows 11 Home 21H2 Build 22000.918 (64 Bit)
- CPU: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-12600K 3.70 GHz
- GPU: XFX Radeon RX 6700 XT 12 GB Speedster QICK 319 Black Video Card
- Motherboard: ASUS TUF Gaming Z690-Plus WIFI D4 ATX LGA 1700
- RAM: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
- PSU: EVGA 210-GQ-0750-V1 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-modular ATX Power Supply
- Monitor: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27VQ 27" Curved 1080P 165Hz (Supports 144Hz) DisplayPort 1.2 and Freesync
**Update as of 9/25/2022 - So I used DDU to unistall my AMD driver. I also ensured when I reinstalled AMD Software: Adrenaline Edition I installed version 22.5.1 which was recommended below. I still do not have teh Display tab in my preferences. Is there anyone else who has another possible solution?